[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [zzdev] :zz,hier,tyrf: Deep overlap in ZigZag (was Re: :gzz: Modules (wuz Re: :zz,tyrf: "Re: [zzdev] Using XML import/export
- To: Ted Nelson <ted@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [zzdev] :zz,hier,tyrf: Deep overlap in ZigZag (was Re: :gzz: Modules (wuz Re: :zz,tyrf: "Re: [zzdev] Using XML import/export
- From: "Tuomas J. Lukka" <lukka@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 03:56:12 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx, marlene@xxxxxxxxxx, xanni@xxxxxxxxxx, eharter@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <220.127.116.11.20000707104225.007db2a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Well, an applitude comes pretty close to a module, in fact.
> In some ways. But the boundary is fuzzier and there's deep
> overlap. Hierarchy and encapsulation generally rule out deep
> For instance, in the genealogy demo of my Norwegian
> relatives, all the cells for the people might already be present.
> So just connecting them embraces them within the applitude.
Yes, absolutely. But explaining that it is *similar* but somewhat
different will be much better when explaining it to people who know
about modules and not applitudes.
Also, "modular" is a *very* positive word for techies so you may want
to use it in presentations and *then* explain how applitudes make really
cool modularity possible.