[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] :gzz: Correction: I was using 0704 version till yesterday. Best, T
- To: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] :gzz: Correction: I was using 0704 version till yesterday. Best, T
- From: "Tuomas J. Lukka" <lukka@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:29:40 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20000711143253.I18486@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 07:11:57AM +0300, Tuomas J. Lukka wrote:
> > Right, of course... or maybe
> >
> > make VERSION=0.01 version
> >
> > would be easiest; editing a file and then tagging it in CVS would
> > not be good.
>
> I wouldn't do that. That way your source tarball cannot reproduce the
> same binary out of the box.
Ouch. That means that when making a version, we must make a temporary
change to CVS and then back that change out again?
Tuomas