[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] gzigzag commit policy?

To: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] gzigzag commit policy?
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:14:08 +0300
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000704035220.24020G-100000@fuga>; from lukka@xxxxxx on Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:55:33AM +0300
Mail-followup-to: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
References: <20000704093318.C16245@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000704035220.24020G-100000@fuga>
Sender: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <ajk@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:55:33AM +0300, Tuomas J. Lukka wrote:
> Please include ChangeLog entries - we've been lazy about that
> but we must start doing it just because there are more of us.

Um, why keep a changelog manually while there are commit log entries?
There is software to automatically generate a changelog from the commit
log.  To me this sounds like duplicate work which can be left to the
machines :-)

-- 
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@xxxxxx % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] gzigzag commit policy?
  - From: Tuomas J. Lukka

References:
- gzigzag commit policy?
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: [zzdev] gzigzag commit policy?
  - From: Tuomas J. Lukka

Prev by Date: Re: URGENT: possibility of new tarball?
Next by Date: Re: [zzdev] Re: URGENT: possibility of new tarball?
Previous by thread: Re: [zzdev] gzigzag commit policy?
Next by thread: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] gzigzag commit policy?
Index(es):