[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
:zz: Fontlery (was: Clarif. re inside/contents
- To: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: :zz: Fontlery (was: Clarif. re inside/contents
- From: Ted Nelson <ted@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 18:34:21 +0900
- Cc: ted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <19981028165431.S6044@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <3.0.3.32.19981028141112.008cc3e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Your <3.0.3.32.19981028111307.00f7bc70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19981028034200.11120.qmail@xxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.3.32.19981028141112.008cc3e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
Quoth LaBek:
>> The expected structures is:
>> d.contents \/ d.inside => ("|" here means "no connection)
>> A a
>> b
>> c
>> B d
>> e
>> f
>
>This doesn't make sense to me, sorry :( (Is Ted using a weird
>proportional font?)
Times. Use it for everything. Geez, do I have to give that up?
Sigh. I'm willing.
But if THIS didn't make sense--
>>("|" here means "no connection)
it's because I forgot to delete it as I rewrote. Sorry.
T
At 04:54 PM 10/28/98 +1100, you wrote:
>Ted Nelson wrote:
>> The concept is simple, and exactly matches the names,
>> *once you get it* ;-)
>> but as with so many things, getting it may not be
>> instantaneous.
>> AHEM! (Tapping pointer on lectern) =====
>
>It's complicated! Inside/contents I've never grokked :(
>
>> "Inside" is transitive-- (could it be otherwise?)--
>
>Guess it could, but it wouldn't make sense. It always works
>left-right?
>
>> d.inside =>
>> a b c d ...
>> so in this example, b is inside a, c iis inside b, d
>> is inside c, etc.
>
>Therefore, c is also (in a secondary way) inside a too,
>right?
>
>> Now, the problem with only having that one dimension
>> to represent containment is that in this model,
>> each thing can only contain *one other* thing,
>> like nesting Russian dolls.
>
>I'm with you here still ...
>
>> So to put more than one thing inside A, we need
>> some way of representing it, a contents list;
>> and a simple way to do that is have it dangle from
>> the first contained object. A design choice is
>> whether to have some title, or just the first item,
>> at the top of the list; I choose to put the first item,
>> since there might not even be a second.
>
>So with this
>
>A b c d --> inside
> e
> f
>
>(where e and f hang off b)
>
>b, e -and- f are inside A?
>
>> The expected structures is:
>> d.contents \/ d.inside => ("|" here means "no connection)
>> A a
>> b
>> c
>> B d
>> e
>> f
>
>This doesn't make sense to me, sorry :( (Is Ted using a weird
>proportional font?)
>
>bekj
>
>--
>: --Neophilic-Hacker-Grrl-Geek-Eclectic-Gay-Disabled-Boychick--
>: gossamer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.tertius.net.au/~gossamer/
>: Innovation is hard to schedule. -- Dan Fylstra
>
>
____________________________________________________
Theodor Holm Nelson, Visiting Professor of Environmental Information
Keio University, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Fujisawa, Japan
Home Fax from USA: 011-81-466-46-7368 (If in Japan, 0466-46-7368)
Professorial home page http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~ted/
_____________________________________________________
Permanent: Project Xanadu, 3020 Bridgeway #295, Sausalito CA 94965
Tel. 415/ 331-4422, fax 415/332-0136
http://www.xanadu.net
PERMANENT E-MAIL: ted@xxxxxxxxxx
_____________________________________________________
Quotation of the day, 98.10.28:
"The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is
comprehensible." Albert Einstein