[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :zz: Peter's oooo...kay: Is ZZ an OS?
- To: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: :zz: Peter's oooo...kay: Is ZZ an OS?
- From: Ted Nelson <ted@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 00:52:24 +0900
- Cc: ted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <19981002014124.O2218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <3.0.3.32.19980630000324.014597e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.3.32.19980630000324.014597e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
Hi Andrew-- welcome back--
>> Actually, ZigZag **is** conceptually an OS--
>> meaning a very clean way of structuring data
>> at the lowest level. So I'm interested in making it one,
>> someday, somehow.
>
>That's not an OS; that's a file system (a system for filing things!)
As I stated it, yes. As I meant it, no.
If we create a system which has no constructs
other than ZZ structures, it is more than a filing
system. It will be a complete conceptual environment
and hence qualify as an operating system.
By that time, presumably the original scaffolding
of Perl and database will have been replaced with
something closer to the hardware, or more appropriate
for efficiency etc.
Obviously we can *simulate* an all-ZZ system with
the present structure, and taking it out to Unix commands,
for a long time.
Another way to look at it: if ZZ functions are available
at what is presently called the "file level", so you can
attach things to files via zz connections, and begin to
redesign conventional files in terms of discrete connections
among ZZ structures and (say) OSMIC streams,
now you're creating a comprehensive environment
independent of the fundamental constructs of conventional
operating systems. This is one of my intents.
>An OS is responsible for directly operating the hardware and providing
>a standardised way to access and manipulate computer hardware and system
>services, which is not something I expect ZigZag would be well suited for.
Well, maybe we'll just see, won't we !-)
ChrzT
===========================================
At 01:41 AM 10/2/98 +1000, you wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 30, 1998 at 12:03:24AM +0900, Ted Nelson wrote:
>> >Does it contain its own OS,
>>
>> Not currently. Maybe someday.
>>
>> Actually, ZigZag **is** conceptually an OS--
>> meaning a very clean way of structuring data
>> at the lowest level. So I'm interested in making it one,
>> someday, somehow.
>
>That's not an OS; that's a file system (a system for filing things!)
>An OS is responsible for directly operating the hardware and providing
>a standardised way to access and manipulate computer hardware and system
>services, which is not something I expect ZigZag would be well suited for.
>However Zigzag, like other file systems, would certainly make sense as
>a component of an operating system, something we have certainly considered.
>
>Cheers,
> *** Xanni ***
>--
>mailto:xanni@xxxxxxxxxx Andrew Pam
>http://www.xanadu.com.au/ Technical VP, Xanadu
>http://www.glasswings.com.au/ Technical Editor, Glass Wings
>http://www.sericyb.com.au/sc/ Manager, Serious Cybernetics
>P.O. Box 26, East Melbourne VIC 8002 Australia Phone +61 3 96511511
>
>
____________________________________________________
Theodor Holm Nelson, Visiting Professor of Environmental Information
Keio University, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Fujisawa, Japan
Home Fax from USA: 011-81-466-46-7368 (If in Japan, 0466-46-7368)
Professorial home page http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~ted/
_____________________________________________________
Permanent: Project Xanadu, 3020 Bridgeway #295, Sausalito CA 94965
Tel. 415/ 331-4422, fax 415/332-0136
http://www.xanadu.net
PERMANENT E-MAIL: ted@xxxxxxxxxx
_____________________________________________________
Quotation of the day, 98.10.01:
"There are no problems, only solutions." Vortner Squattoon