[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [zzdev] Re: [zigzag] GZigZag 0.5.0 has been released]
- To: Edward Harter <eharter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zigzag] GZigZag 0.5.0 has been released]
- From: Tuomas Lukka <lukka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:19:18 +0200
- Cc: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@xxxxxx>, ZZ Development <zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <f05010401b6933b487521@[192.168.0.3]>; from eharter@xxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:12:26PM +0900
- Mail-followup-to: Edward Harter <eharter@xxxxxxxxx>, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@xxxxxx>, ZZ Development <zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <f05010401b6933b487521@[192.168.0.3]>
> The word 'stable' is used twice here, in the phrases "well-tested,
> stable code" and then in "we can provide stable, solid releases that
> are ready for production use."
This is with "life after 1.0". With 0.* releases, nothing is really
stable in that sense. Unless you are somehow able to get a lot more
paid programmers working on this and so on.
If you have a *PARTICULAR* problem with version 0.5.0, we'll be glad
to hear about it. If you just have vague, general distrust of everything,
it's probably not useful to continue this discussion. With free software,
everyone, INCLUDING YOU, is in testing. If you were paying us something for
it, the situation would be different.
Tuomas