[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :zz: The Plan for ZigZag (4) FORMIDABLE LIST OF SMALL CHANGES
- To: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: :zz: The Plan for ZigZag (4) FORMIDABLE LIST OF SMALL CHANGES
- From: Ted Nelson <ted@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 15:09:58 +0900
- Cc: ted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <19980714103046.A2074@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <3.0.3.32.19980713212722.008afb50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.3.32.19980713212722.008afb50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
Bek,
>The OOP/modular style also means it's MUCH easier to (eventually) make
>seperate modules so we can just "slot in" a different display module
>if we want the output to go to a web browser, or whatever. Also that
>we can just "slot in" a different data access module if we want it to
>use an OSMIC server, or anything else.
>
>And besides, I keep getting lost in the sourcecode the way it is -
>it's too monolithic!!
>
>Best estimate, give me a solid week - at my working speed - and I'll
>have it going. It's more of a "rearrangement" than a rewrite :)
>
>Pleeeeeeeeeease??
Your wish is granted! I didn't know that we'd
want to make this transition so soon. But that's
just fine.
I presume you and Andrew are in agreement on this.
I want to stay closely attuned with both of you
as development continues. Wrong alleyways are
very expensive.
All the best, Ted
At 10:30 AM 7/14/98 +1000, you wrote:
>Ted Nelson wrote:
>> Well, here they are. And this may not be all.
>> Please respond soon, even if you've only had time
>> to skim this.
>
>Just read it quickly, and the other one not at all.
>
>My main response is that I -NEED- to be allowed to "port" (transfer,
>actually) ZigZag to Object-Oriented Perl. It's getting too big and
>too messy to be written in the flat way it is.
>
>The OOP/modular style also means it's MUCH easier to (eventually) make
>seperate modules so we can just "slot in" a different display module
>if we want the output to go to a web browser, or whatever. Also that
>we can just "slot in" a different data access module if we want it to
>use an OSMIC server, or anything else.
>
>And besides, I keep getting lost in the sourcecode the way it is -
>it's too monolithic!!
>
>Best estimate, give me a solid week - at my working speed - and I'll
>have it going. It's more of a "rearrangement" than a rewrite :)
>
>Pleeeeeeeeeease??
>
>Gossamer
>
>--
>: Gossamer gossamer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Xanadoodler
>: http://www.tertius.net.au/~gossamer/ | And proud of it :)
>: Nothing determines who we will become, so much as those things we
>: chose to ignore. -- Isaac Asimov
>
>
________________________________________________________
Theodor Holm Nelson, Visiting Professor of Environmental Information
Keio University, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Fujisawa, Japan
http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~ted/ PERMANENT E-MAIL: ted@xxxxxxxxxx
Home Fax: 0466-46-7368 From USA: 011-81-466-46-7368
_________________________________________________________
Project Xanadu (Permanent)
3020 Bridgeway #295, Sausalito CA 94965
Tel. 415/ 331-4422, fax 415/ 332-0136
http://www.xanadu.net
_________________________________________________________
Quotation of the day, 98.07.13:
"Obsolete power corrupts obsoletely." TN86