[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Foot-shooting and going to OO
- To: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Foot-shooting and going to OO
- From: Gossamer <gossamer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 07:00:28 +1000
- In-reply-to: <3.0.3.32.19980615181143.00a4cc40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Ted Nelson on Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 06:11:43PM +0900
- References: <19980520092943.A8224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19980520092943.A8224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19980520161309.19488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.3.32.19980615181143.00a4cc40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
Ted Nelson wrote:
> Having thought over the problem of increasing special cases and
> restrictions, I think it justifies going to OO programming
> (presumably Java on Metrowerks) for the next major revision. As I
> understand it, OO will make it easier and safer to constrain
> activities on particular dimensions and cell types.
You're right about OO being an appropriate thing.
Just thought you should know, I don't like programming in Java, so I
won't be working on it when you shift. Wasn't sure if you were aware
of that.
Gossamer
--
: Gossamer - gossamer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.tertius.net.au/~gossamer/
: *** Link of the week: http://www.gnuhoo.com/ ***
: Don't say 'can't'. Because it isn't true. If you truly cannot
: accomplish something, then say 'can't yet', and either begin to learn
: how, or find a way to avoid doing it (could someone else do it for
: you?). -- Gossamer