[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
ReRe: [zigzag] ... How clones work-- YUP
- To: zigzag@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: ReRe: [zigzag] ... How clones work-- YUP
- From: Ted Nelson <ted@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:00:49 +0900
- Cc: ted@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <3.0.1.16.19990910162122.61cfa802@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <3.0.6.32.19990911020358.0082cc70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.1.16.19990910122722.593f3178@xxxxxxxx> <3.0.6.32.19990910170737.007e2810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.1.16.19990908101259.41ff0de0@xxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: zigzag@xxxxxxxxxx
Brent Turcotte said:
>If the clone cell had the contents of its master, that would
>mean storing the cell contents twice. Wasteful and expensive
>if the cell contained graphics. I assume you mean the clone
>cell _visualizally_ looks like the original. I assume the
>clone cell contains a reference to the original cell, either/or
>via a bidirectional link or a cell reference in the cell content.
>(a bidirectional link would allow a user to scroll though a
>series of clones, a cell reference in the cell contents would be
>a direct link)
Guess how connected? The CLONE DIMENSION.
>Visually, you could edit the clone but it is original that would
>change internally.
Exactly correct.
Best, Ted
At 04:21 PM 9/10/99, you wrote:
>>Very original and possibly useful, but you've got it backward.
>>
>>A clone cell doesn't have the connections of its master,
>> only the contents. So the guaranteed same contents can be
>> in more than one place. If you want to link those contents
>> in the same dimension twice, you clone them. Right now the
>> visualization is crude, but it'll get better.
>>
>>Best, Ted
>
>If the clone cell had the contents of its master, that would
>mean storing the cell contents twice. Wasteful and expensive
>if the cell contained graphics. I assume you mean the clone
>cell _visualizally_ looks like the original. I assume the
>clone cell contains a reference to the original cell, either/or
>via a bidirectional link or a cell reference in the cell content.
>(a bidirectional link would allow a user to scroll though a
>series of clones, a cell reference in the cell contents would be
>a direct link)
>
>Visually, you could edit the clone but it is original that would
>change internally.
>
>Brent
>
>At 02:03 AM 11/09/99 +0900, you wrote:
>>Hi--
>>
>>Your thought:
>>
>>>OK, I think I get it. You would clone the whole spreadsheet.
>>>The individual cell contents would be maintained in the orginal
>>>dimensions of the spreadsheet. In the clone dimension, each
>>>and every cell would be copied but their would be no contents
>>>in the cells themselves (or there might be a cell reference
>>>indicting where the cell contents are maintained).
>>>What would be copied would be all the horizontal and vertical
>>>links from the spreadsheet. And each empty cell in the clone
>>>dimension would have a link to the orginal contents along the
>>>clone dimension.
>
>
>
____________________________________________________
Theodor Holm Nelson
Project Professor, Keio University SFC Campus, Fujisawa, Japan
Visiting Professor, University of Southampton, England
- - - e-mail: ted@xxxxxxxxxx - - - world-wide fax 1/415/331-4422
- - - http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~ted/ - - - http://www.xanadu.net
- - - - - Coordinates in USA Tel. 415/ 331-4422
Project Xanadu, 3020 Bridgeway #295, Sausalito CA 94965
____________________________________________________
Quotation of the Day, 99.09.07
Everything is interconnected, but not uniformly. TN99