[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fandom, Parody, Copyright and Xanadu
- To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Fandom, Parody, Copyright and Xanadu
- From: Joseph Osako <scholr@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:42:59 -0700
- Reply-to: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In the past year, a number of fan and parody sites have come under
fire from the owners of the intellectual property they reflect upon.
Both Paramount and Lucasfilm were painted as heavies early in the
year when they forced the closure of large numbers of fan sites
relating to Star Trek and Star Wars, respectively - despite the fact
that these sites were, as a whole, beneficial to the owners. The two
firms lawyer's argued that these sites were taking traffic (and thus
advertising money) away from the 'offical' sites, but rational
evidence indicates that most such traffic *originated* from the fan
sites they were targetting. Despite the narrow, technical facts of
property rights infringment, virtually every outside observer
concluded that the companies had shot themselves in their feet.
The latest round of web site closure attempts, however, are both more
ambiguous and disturbing. Several publishers have gone after parody
sites, sites which take existing material and distort it for humorous
or satirical effect. On the one hand, no one would ever argue that
the original material has benefitted in any way, as one could with
the fan sites. On the other hand, however, this action raises the
spectre of censorship. The obvious question becomes, are the owners
trying to protect their rights, or muzzle their hecklers?
The most notable of closures, taking place this past week, is the
attempt by King's Features Syndicate to shut down a site titled
'Dysfunctional Family Circus' (http://www.spinnwebe.com/dfc/), which
features original Keane artwork with reader-submitted captions. The
cartoons are not linked from the King's site (which didn't exist at
the time DFC began), which would give a 'reasonable use' argument,
but rather were scanned in directly by the webmaster. Even given that
it is parody, Galcik (the site's owner) will have a difficult time
proving that he was acting within reasonable use. The submissions are
edited for quality, but not content, and much of it is crude, rude
and obscene - and invariably far funnnier than the original (in case
you are wondering, yes, I have posted to it myself, under the name
'Schol-R-LEA').
However: this site is a continuation of an earlier site, and an even
earlier print 'zine feature, going back to the mid-1980s. It has been
an underweb mainstay since the earliest days of the WWW. So why is it
only coming under fire now, when they must have known about it long
ago? Good question.
Like many old, large corporations, KFS is having trouble adjusting to
the WWW, and they seem to be confused themselves about what can and
cannot be done. Like virtually everyone who has tried to conduct
business online, they have gotten a black eye in the process, and
they seem to be looking for someone to blame.
This brings us to Xanadu (if you were wondering), and what may be the
most important reason for it of all. The Web, due to inherent
limitations of its design, cannot reasonably track ownership of and
royalties on intellectual property. What's more, too little material
is currently in electronic form even now for effective use of
commercial material to be made. Current Copyright law, which has
become increasingly more restrictive (i.e., the extension of rights
from 50 to 75 years) despite the greater flexibility possible under
computerized systems. It will be necessary very soon to resolve these
and other rights related issues, and soon, or the web will become an
unusable morass of proprietary security and poorly maintained public
domain material, swamped by litigation - indeed, one could say it is
that already. Xanadu, which was designed to resolve all of these
issues from the start, is the only reasonable way out of this growing
disaster.
PS: Spinnwebe (Galcik) has kept a careful record of the developments
in the case, including links to most of the online media coverage.
IMNSHO, it makes a good case study in web-related intellectual
property issues. Take a look at the site (again,
http://www.spinnwebe.com/dfc/) for more details.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBN+5bIxP+DcK/9dz8EQLKewCgxpCEHyqVoa3tsb4UNyKE8vsZNkwAn0b2
c1KkXtFsSlDgvjOLdBuYAIYY
=+8/3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Schol-R-LEA;2 ELF JAM LCF BiWM MGT GS (http://www.slip.net/~scholr/)
First Speaker, Last Eristic Church of Finagle and Holy Bisexuality
i with the soul of a hamlet ** The only God you need is the one
doomed always to wallow in farce ** that looks out of your mirror