[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transclusion Issues
- To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Transclusion Issues
- From: Andrew Pam <xanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 17:33:42 +1000 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970822161218.3997G-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Tripp Lilley" at Aug 22, 97 04:14:11 pm
- Organization: Xanadu Australia
- Reply-to: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tripp Lilley wrote:
> This is where the necessity for "versioning" of documents and portions
> becomes critical. If the transcluded doc is "versioned", then the
> transclusion of the reviewer/critic refers to a specific version.
> Hopefully, a good transclusion UI will offer the reader the information
> that there are newer versions of the transcluded document, so the reader
> can assess how things have changed since Author B's criticism. In this
> way, Authors A and B ought be able to go back and forth forever, without
> the reader "missing" any of the interplay.
Exactly so.
Cheers,
*** Xanni ***
--
mailto:xanni@xxxxxxxxxx Andrew Pam
http://www.xanadu.net/xanadu/ Technical VP, Xanadu
http://www.glasswings.com.au/ Technical Editor, Glass Wings
http://www.sericyb.com.au/sc/ Manager, Serious Cybernetics
P.O. Box 26, East Melbourne VIC 8002 Australia Phone +61 3 96511511