[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xanadu & Mona Lisa
- To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Xanadu & Mona Lisa
- From: Peter Schmidt <peter.infinidim@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 08:32:31 +0200
- Organization: InfiniDim Enterprises
- References: <l03102802afe6ffbc9f4e@[207.217.16.130]>
- Reply-to: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: xanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Charles Cameron wrote:
> Ted, Friends:
>
> Let me put a problem / issue before you...
>
> Suppose for a moment that the Mona Lisa is a digital artwork in which
> Leonardo has the rights. Marcel Duchamp wants to make his own artwork
>
> which will be identical to Leonardo's, except that he is adding a
> moustache
> to Mona, and putting a small note at the bottom of the image which
> says
> LHOOQ (pronounced "elle a chaud au cul" -- "she has a hot ass" if my
> French
> is still working). Clearly, the rights in Duchamp's work are largely
> Leonardo's, but the rights in the moustache and comment are Duchamp's.
>
> Now suppose that someone else wants to make another artwork which has
> the
> basic facial features of the Mona Lisa, but the outlines of nose,
> eyebrows,
> eyes, cheek, mouth and chin, etc., are to be "built" of neon strips --
> see:
>
> http://losangelesdowntown.com/Neon.html
>
> Clearly, the derivation of this work from Leonardo's original is
> similar to
> the derivation of Duchamp's: but, so to speak, *all the pixels* have
> changed, in a way that they haven't in the Duchamp work.
>
> How does one (ie Xanadu) assess the dependence of this Neon Lisa on
> the
> original?
>
> This seems to me to be a problem in the comparison of structures,
> rather
> than a simple matter of quotation as with Duchamp. How far has Xanadu
> come
> towards the point where this type of homology can be explored and
> quantified?
>
> I get the impression from Ted's own pages that this may be the sort of
>
> question that deeply interests him, the sort of thing addressed by his
>
> words:
>
> :: I am especially concerned about parallelism in many ways:
> :: parallel presentation on computer screens, parallel data
> :: structures, and considering how things are alike and different,
> :: which requires comparing them in parallel. This is what my
> :: computer work is about.
>
> Any comments?
Yes, i have a comment. :-)
I had a look at the picture you quote. It is not that obvious, but i
think you could see this piece of art as "two-layered"; one layer still
represents the original Mona Lisa (just 10-5% visible, but still the
original), the 2nd layer is the "Neon-Layer" added with abstractions of
nose, lips, eybrowes as neon-strips.
Basically this could be compared to the process of getting the picture
using photoshop or something else. 1. Put Mona Lisa on layer one. 2.
Decrease transparency to 10%. 3. Set up a 2nd Layer. 4. start to draw
your own "extensions" to Mona ...
Could a layer-like structure be reflected by Xanadu ?!? (So to reflect,
or not to reflect seems to be the question).
Cheers.
Peter
--
*******************************************************************
* mailto: peter.infinidim@xxxxxxx * http://www.asca.de/infinidim *
*******************************************************************
* ... dear bill, 42 is the final answer, not 95 or 97 !!! ... *
*******************************************************************