Re: comments on transclusion I-D

[Andrew Pam <xanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ron Daniel Jr. wrote:
> I think that the ability to transclude portions of HTML and text
> documents is very important. However, I don't think the IETF is the
> place to tackle this problem.
> 
> First, the IETF no longer has an HTML working group. The W3C is now
> attempting to standardize HTML.

The transclusion Internet-Draft is being presented to and discussed with
both the W3C and Netscape.

> Second, the W3C already has the "object" proposal which is what they
> are going to recommend for including various media and executable
> objects. I suggest you look at that proposal and see how to modify it
> to accomodate transclusions of textual resources.

Thanks for this excellent suggestion.

Share and enjoy,
		*** Xanni ***
-- 
mailto:xanni@xxxxxxxxxx                         Andrew Pam
http://www.xanadu.net/xanadu/                   Technical VP, Xanadu
http://www.glasswings.com.au/                   Technical Editor, Glass Wings
http://www.sericyb.com.au/sc/                   Manager, Serious Cybernetics
P.O. Box 26, East Melbourne VIC 8002 Australia  Phone +61 3 96511511