onward

[ted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> From avatar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Nov 22 07:12:36 1995
> Subject: RE: "xurl? 
> To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: oster@xxxxxxxxxx (David Phillip Oster)
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:21:17 -0800
> Sender: avatar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Content-Length: 228
> 
> Naturally, in a project like this I don't want to re-invent the wheel.
> To write your Mac product, I'll need access to the relevant technical specs,
> and where those specs don't exist, we'll need to write at least a first
> draft.


CHECK!

My schedule: CATCH UP through Monday.

Week in Tokyo.

Catch up some more.

May or may not get stuff out to you before that trip.

Keep reminding me.

Best, T


P.S.  Excellent arguments are coming in both for and against
 putting the protocol under http.  Perhaps we should try it both ways.