[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: VC and PO: data-informing in archiving
- To: <mark>
 
- Subject: re: VC and PO: data-informing in archiving
 
- From: Eric Dean Tribble <tribble>
 
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 89 20:11:53 PDT
 
- Cc: <us>
 
- In-reply-to: <MarkS.Miller'smessageofFri>,20 PDT <8909020409.AA12955@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
For starters, the capabilities are different.  When a Stamp is
      complete, it is no longer data-informable.  Archiving will certainly
      result in frozen Berts onto data-informable Orgls.  That's the only
      way to have parts of published documents stored (like the part used in
      a quote).
   Now I'm totally confused.  Why should archiving ever result in a
   frozen Bert of all things?  Orgls aren't data-informable, Stamps are. 
Two examples to clarify this.
1) Machine A has a document X that quotes document Y.  The quoted
material got transferred to A along with X.  Machine A ought to
represent Y with a frozen Bert (because the actual document Y is
frozen) onto a partial orgl that just contains the quoted material.
Only when someone actually cares about Y itself does A bother
retrieving the rest of the contents from another machine.
2) Machine A has frozen Berts X and Y and all their data.  X and Y
share data.  Now the archiver throws away Y.  Some other user later
gets Y from machine B which does not contain X.  Now machine A has
both X and Y, but without the sharing information between them.
dean