[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Warning: Tree raster can hang you
- To: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Warning: Tree raster can hang you
- From: "Tuomas J. Lukka" <lukka@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 06:09:11 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20000716132322.D14285@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 05:59:39AM +0300, Tuomas J. Lukka wrote:
> > 0.1: not enough room to move towards 1.0
> The room is countably infinite. I don't know how we'd create uncountably
> many versions before 1.0.
But there's a standards problem: some people have used
and other use them as numbers; 0.11 is between 0.1 and 0.2.
It's common enough to make me want to avoid it.
> (Think of 0.10 being newer than 0.9.)
> > 0.0.1: I dislike non-floating-point versions.
> And I dislike floating-point versions :-)
For what reason?
> > Any reason in particular to use those?
> It's just that it's more standard. (At least where I come from.)
0.01 is pretty much standard on CPAN.