Re:Re:Submission of draft-pam-html-fine-trans-00.txt

[Roman Suzuki <roman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Petersen wrote:
>Comment #1. Since what is included is in a sense a (dynamic) image (in a
>broader sense) of a different text, why can't the IMG element simply be
>extended to permit this? OK, this may cause problems. In that case, INCLUDE
>may be better than TEXT.

I think INCLUDE is suitable for transclusion than TEXT.
Because
	TEXT-tag can be nest, like "#include" in C language.
	TEXT-tag will be translate into not only text but also images 
	tables and all kind of what appears in html. 

Last week, I got translating(English to Japanese) software that behaves 
proxy server working in local computer. 
That hands translated html documents to Web browser as a result of
request.
This software made me to believe that implementing transclusion on
proxy-server 
is the best way to experience transclusion first.
(When Andrew proposed some ways to implement transclusion I was hooked
on Java.)

-- 
Roman Suzuki
E-mail:  
  roman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  gcf01256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Homepage:
  http://pweb.aix.or.jp/~roman-suzu/