[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: requesting code for updated udanax green
- To: udanax@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: requesting code for updated udanax green
- From: ED5BAF61B141 FE1829D7F63FF817756D <ed5baf61b141fe1829d7f63ff817756d@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <20040408162406.GH1662@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- Andrew Pam <xanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:09:42AM -0700, ED5BAF61B141 FE1829D7F63FF817756D
> > obviously, it does not matter quite what versioning system you use as long
> > it works. my main point here was that, there should be a publicly
> > repository containing the udanax source code.
> One of the advantages of arch is that it's much easier to set up
> secure public repositories, since protocols such as SFTP and WebDAV
> are supported. Public CVS repositories are unfortunately problematic
> to secure. (I participated in the IETF committee for WebDAV, and would
> also like to see a WebDAV gateway to a Udanax backend some day!)
I meant a publicly accessible read only repository, security is not quite an
issue then. the question is then will one will be set up, read-only or not.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway